franny
bananafish

definitions...bother to learn them if you use the words
Tue Sep 08 2009

some examples:

Wikipedia:

Socialism refers to various theories of economic organization advocating state, worker or public ownership and administration of the means of production and allocation of resources, and a society characterized by equal access to resources for all individuals with an egalitarian method of compensation.[1][2][3] Contrary to popular belief, socialism is not a political system; it is an economic system distinct from capitalism.

Socialists mainly share the belief that capitalism unfairly concentrates power and wealth among a small segment of society that controls capital and derives its wealth through exploitation, creates an unequal society, does not provide equal opportunities for everyone to maximize their potentialities and does not utilize technology and resources to their maximum potential nor in the interests of the public. Therefore socialists advocate the creation of a society that allows for the widespread application of modern technology to rationalize economic activity by eliminating the anarchy in production of capitalism[4], allowing for wealth and power to be distributed based on the amount of work expended in production, although there is considerable disagreement among socialists over how and to what extent this could be achieved.

Socialism is not a concrete philosophy of fixed doctrine and program; its branches advocate a degree of social interventionism and economic rationalization (usually in the form of economic planning), sometimes opposing each other. Another dividing feature of the socialist movement is the split between reformists and revolutionaries on how a socialist economy should be established. Some socialists advocate complete nationalization of the means of production, distribution, and exchange; others advocate state control of capital within the framework of a market economy. Socialists inspired by the Soviet model of economic development have advocated the creation of centrally planned economies directed by a state that owns all the means of production. Others, including Yugoslavian, Hungarian, German and Chinese Communists in the 1970s and 1980s, instituted various forms of market socialism, combining co-operative and state ownership models with the free market exchange and free price system (but not free prices for the means of production).[5]

Modern socialism originated in the late 18th-century intellectual and working class political movement that criticized the effects of industrialization and private ownership on society. The utopian socialists, including Robert Owen (1771–1858), tried to found self-sustaining communes by secession from a capitalist society. Henri de Saint Simon (1760–1825), the first individual to coin the term socialism, was the original thinker who advocated technocracy and industrial planning.[6] The first socialists predicted a world improved by harnessing technology and combining it with better social organization, and many contemporary socialists share this belief. Early socialist thinkers tended to favor an authentic meritocracy combined with rational social planning, while many modern socialists have a more egalitarian approach.

Vladimir Lenin, perhaps influenced by Marx's ideas of "lower" and "upper" stages of socialism[7], later used the word "socialism" as a transitional stage between capitalism and communism.

Social democrats propose selective nationalization of key national industries in mixed economies, while maintaining private ownership of capital and private business enterprise. Social democrats also promote tax-funded welfare programs and regulation of markets. Many social democrats, particularly in European welfare states, refer to themselves as socialists, introducing a degree of ambiguity to the understanding of what the term means. Libertarian socialism (including social anarchism and libertarian Marxism) rejects state control and ownership of the economy altogether and advocates direct collective ownership of the means of production via co-operative workers' councils and workplace democracy.

Socialism:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A theory or system of social reform which contemplates a complete reconstruction of society, with a more just and equitable distribution of property and labor. In popular usage, the term is often employed to indicate any lawless, revolutionary social scheme. See Communism, Fourierism, Saint-Simonianism, forms of socialism.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
so·cial·ism
* Pronunciation: ˈsō-shə-ˌli-zəm
* Function: noun
* Date: 1837
1 : any of various economic and political theories advocating collective or governmental ownership and administration of the means of production and distribution of goods
2 a : a system of society or group living in which there is no private property b : a system or condition of society in which the means of production are owned and controlled by the state
3 : a stage of society in Marxist theory transitional between capitalism and communism and distinguished by unequal distribution of goods and pay according to work done

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


http://www.floridausa.com/nonpartisans/gwb.html

check this out for 1 person's view of George W. Bush's presidency.

5 Comments
  • From:
    Richardsworld (Legacy)
    On:
    Tue Sep 08 2009
    It's not the speech, it's the man. He is a disgrace to the Presidency and to our nation. His Socialist agenda is as unamerican as it could possibly be and conservatives are calling him on it every day. I get my pep talks from Fox News, my Pastor, and American history. I love Bill Clinton and this President is no Bill Clinton, just a flaw of a wayward confused democratic party. He only reresents the people who want a free ride in this country and those who play the victim because they have no character or work ethic. Time will show that this president was the worst president in American history including Jimmy Carter.
  • From:
    Franny (Legacy)
    On:
    Tue Sep 08 2009
    1. what exactly makes him a disgraceful man?
    give me examples to prove your point

    2. the notion of those with little work ethic and/or character looking for a free ride...hmmn. i work with folks such as this and
    a. they are US citizens
    b. they have the luxury of healthcare and benefits and STILL complain.

    in fact, in almost every workplace that i've been employed, there are folks like this...lazy, complainers, no character...this has been a plague probably since the employer and employere first began to exist. also, it seems to me that those with opportunity, connections, and money have done the most damage to the american worker (just check off Mr. Madoff as an example among the many)...what was his excuse? in every society and class those who work the hardest, receive the least.
    i speak as a veterinary nurse
    a woman
    a hispanic that is college educated and has worked above and beyond only to be given little consideration from my numerous employers through out my life.

    3. it doesn't really matter to me personally where you get your pep talks. the simple fact that a president is being demonized for encouraging students to do their best is simply a sad comment, period because the folks doing the demonizing have "their agenda" to spread.

    4. seems to me that the worst president just finished an 8 year term.
  • From:
    LightsOfParis (Legacy)
    On:
    Tue Sep 08 2009
    I loved the speech, told my children about it and they were looking forward to seeing it today in school.

    My chest puffs when I see him, because it's about DAMN time we get someone of character in office.

  • From:
    Franny (Legacy)
    On:
    Tue Sep 08 2009
    ps. Jimmy Carter won the Nobel Peace Prize (what a loser!) and Bill Clinton (scandalous womanizer, was able to negotiate the release of two female journalists in North Korea). while his actions in the White House with Ms. Lewinsky were shameful and disgraceful (yes, there is an appropriate labeling of behavior) it didn't do the damage that say, Nixon's little watergate problem did. don't cha think?????
  • From:
    Salamander (Legacy)
    On:
    Wed Sep 09 2009
    I've stopped telling people that I have sympathy with many of the things that socialism stands for. Even half-a-century later, McCarthyism still creates a huge knee-jerk, hands over eyes and ears simultaneously reaction.